Dozens of women had taken refuge in a childbirth facility in El Fasher, Sudan, when the massacre started. Several had recently given birth, while others were actively in labor.
On duty during that fateful night, a 28-year-old lab technician, Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, managed to survive the ordeal. “I heard the screams of women and children,” he recounts. “They executed everybody inside the hospital. We who were able to escape, did so.”
This brutal attack stands as among the worst examples in the protracted internal conflict tearing the African nation apart. Militiamen raided the hospital, allegedly slaughtering more than 460 individuals receiving care and their families.
Rights organizations have labeled it “an act of unspeakable brutality,” and a clear case of the collapse in safety for civilians caught in conflict zones in several nations at war.
Despite every significant nation have agreed to the international laws of war, which obligate them to protect civilians, the past year has experienced a historic high of attacks on healthcare systems. Expectant mothers are highly exposed due to their dependence on locally available medical care.
An investigation of records uncover an shocking trend: nearly 300 incidents targeting or hindering maternity care facilities, staff, and pregnant women over the last three years, including at least 119 direct strikes on hospitals and delivery wards.
“This is not standard wartime hazards. They constitute a pattern of reproductive violence.”
The majority of these assaults have occurred in Ukraine, Gaza, and Sudan, where a vast number of expectant mothers are stranded.
Women have been killed, denied medical attention, or forced to give birth in perilous and unsafe environments. The data also indicates that at least 68 midwives, obstetricians, and gynaecologists have been slain, 15 taken hostage, and 101 detained—sometimes while assisting births.
The numbers are probably a significant underestimate, as they are limited to incidents documented publicly. In many conflict zones, communications are sparse.
Last year, findings indicated that 50% of women who died during pregnancy or childbirth resided in a war zone. This underscores a catastrophic reality.
Apart from fatalities, these attacks are destroying critical infrastructure for mothers and babies, creating a grave danger to societal repopulation and recovery.
In Gaza, the catastrophic impact on the right to maternal care has been cited by a UN commission as one reason behind accusations of genocidal acts.
Despite periods of calm, doctors report that women and children continue to die from inadequate care, owing to desperate lacks of medicine and equipment. Accounts describe women having children by the roadside because hospitals were out of reach.
“Direct shelling targeting the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,” states the head of a major hospital’s gynecology department. A military spokesperson has contested deliberately targeting maternity care or seeking to affect birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 maternity and neonatal facilities have been attacked and rendered unusable in Ukraine. Reports from frontline hospitals describe births taking place in basements and extreme psychological pressure leading to problems during delivery.
“The attacks on us are intentional,” says the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. The government has disputed deliberately targeting civilians.
“In fact, every facility is now a potential target,” states a medical director in Sumy. “If a drone is destroyed, the falling debris could impact a hospital.”
For the hundreds of millions of women living near active conflicts, there are few safeguards and a stark lack of legal accountability for those targeting maternity care.
This lack of accountability has led to a “culture of impunity,” explains a human rights lawyer. “Violence targeting childbirth, like coerced birth or involuntary sterilization, may constitute acts of genocide by destroying a group's future.”
In El Fasher, the area lacked access to humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition rising sharply, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is scarce because of a lack of access from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma struck a baby care unit, resulting in tragic loss of life.
In Myanmar, hospitals have come under fire and dozens of midwives and patients have suffered violence over the past two years of civil war.
The majority of childbirth fatalities are avoidable with standard medicine, but war shatters health systems. Rights groups note that fear is now driving women away from facilities once considered safe, resulting in risky home births lacking professional help.
“When childbirth centers become intentional targets speaks to a larger and alarming strategy: the use of attacks on medical facilities as a tool for terror and to destroy community bonds,” observes a legal researcher.
“Hospitals are not completely safe for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities may forfeit their immunity if used for acts deemed ‘militarily advantageous’, which has now become a standard defence.”
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in reviewing online casinos and developing winning strategies for players worldwide.